Comparative Labour Law

A. On Contractual Labour and What Constitutes the Employer/Employee Relationship

A1. United Kingdom

  1. Mersey Docks and Harbour Board vs Coggins and Griffith, [1946] 2 All E.R. 345
  2. Montreal Locomotive Works Ltd v. Montreal and Attorney General of Canada [1947] 1 D.L.R. 161
  3. Cassidy v. Ministry of Health, [1951] 2 K.B. 343.
  4. Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison Ltd. vs MacDonald and Evans, [1951] 1 TLR 101
  5. Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd. Vs. Minister of Pensions and National Insurance, 1 [1968] 2 W.L.R. 775.
  6. Aslam, Farrar and Ors vs Uber, Case Nos 2202550/2015 (UK Employment Tribunal, 28 October 2016) (the “Uber Judgment”), available here

A2. United States

1. United States v. Silk, 331 U.S. 704 (1947)

A3. Australia

  1. Hollis vs Vabu Pty Ltd, [2001] HCA 44.
  2. Fair Work Ombudsman vs Australian Sales & Promotion Pty Ltd, [2016] FCAA 2804 (summary here).

A4. Philippines

  1. Aliviado vs Proctor & Gamble, G.R. No. 160506 (Supreme Court of the Philippines), available here.
Advertisements